Energy Production Corporation v. Northfield Insurance Company et al
| Energy Production Corporation |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company, Northfield Insurance Company, Fairmont Specialty Insurance Managers Inc, Fairmont Specialty Managers Corp and Certain Solvent London Market Insurance Companies |
| 2:2010cv00933 |
| March 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Helen G. Berrigan |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER denying pla's 36 Motion for Leave to Conduct Jurisdictional Discovery as set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 8/5/2010. (rll, ) Modified on 8/6/2010 to edit doc type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
45
ORDERED that pla's 42 Motion to Expedite Consideration of 41 Motion to Strike is GRANTED; motion will be considered on the briefs; FURTHER ORDERED that pla's 41 Motion to Strike, or Alternatively, Motion for Leave to File Reply Memora ndum on Motion for Leave to Conduct Jurisdictional Discovery is GRANTED as to leave to file reply memorandum in support of motion to compel; DENIED as to striking dft Fairmont's untimely response (R. Doc. 38) to its motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 7/14/2010. (rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
