Shaw Constructors, Inc. v. HPD, LLC
Plaintiff: Shaw Constructors, Inc.
Defendant: HPD, LLC
Case Number: 2:2010cv01874
Filed: June 30, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: East Baton Rouge
Presiding Judge: Helen G. Berrigan
Presiding Judge: Daniel E. Knowles
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER & REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that pla's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment to Vacate Arbitration Award is DENIED; FURTHER ORDERED that dft's 41 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 10/25/2010. (rll, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaw Constructors, Inc. v. HPD, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaw Constructors, Inc.
Represented By: Eric A. Kracht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HPD, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?