Allen v. Cain et al
Charles Allen |
Burl Cain |
Attorney General State of Louisiana |
2:2010cv04507 |
December 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
West Feliciana |
Carl Barbier |
Karen Wells Roby |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER & REASONS denying 47 Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Rule 60(b). Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/16/12. (sek, ) |
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 . FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for Habeas Corpus relief is DENIED with prejudice as time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Notice of Attempt toObtain Case and Computer (Rec. Doc. 31), Amendment to Prior Notice Concerning My Attempt to Obtain Case and Computer and Motion for Help From This Court to Preserve Exculpatory Evidence(Rec. Doc. 32), and Notice (Rec. Doc. 34), are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/1/2011.(gec, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER & REASONS: for the reasons stated, IT IS ORDERED that pla's 28 Motion to Compel and 29 Objections and Renewed Motion Concerning this Court's Latest Denial of Request for Compelled Production of Computers Held by Ineffective Defense Lawyer Davidson Ehle are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 6/23/2011. (rll, ) |
Filing 27 ORDER & REASONS denying 22 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 5/27/2011. (rll, ) Modified on 5/31/2011 to edit doc type (rll, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.