Riley v. Napolitano

Riley v. Napolitano

Plaintiff:	Michael J Riley
Defendant:	U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Case Number:	2:2011cv00187
Filed:	January 27, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office:	New Orleans Office
County:	Orleans
Presiding Judge:	Kurt D. Engelhardt
Presiding Judge:	Sally Shushan
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	00 U.S.C. § 0000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 17, 2012	Filing 56 ORDER and REASONS denying 50 Motion for New Trial, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 12/17/2012. (cab)
November 15, 2012	Filing 46 ORDER and REASONS - Before the Court is the "Motion for Summary Judgment" 29 , filed by the defendant. IT IS ORDERED that: the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 29) is hereby GRANTED; the plaintiff's one remain ing claim against the defendant, that of retaliatory discrimination, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and the "Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Rec. Doc. 32) and "Plaintiff's Moti on for Leave to Amend Submission Date [on] Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Liability or Extension of Deadline for Dispositive Motion (Rec. Doc. 35) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/15/2012. (cab)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 17, 2012

Filing 56 ORDER and REASONS denying 50 Motion for New Trial, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 12/17/2012. (cab)

November 15, 2012

Filing 46 ORDER and REASONS - Before the Court is the "Motion for Summary Judgment" 29 , filed by the defendant. IT IS ORDERED that: the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 29) is hereby GRANTED; the plaintiff's one remain ing claim against the defendant, that of retaliatory discrimination, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and the "Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Rec. Doc. 32) and "Plaintiff's Moti on for Leave to Amend Submission Date [on] Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Liability or Extension of Deadline for Dispositive Motion (Rec. Doc. 35) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/15/2012. (cab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. Napolitano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J Riley
Represented By:	Jason E. Cantrell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?