Murungi v. Touro Infirmary et al
| James H Murungi |
| Touro Infirmary, Lee B. Hankins, Raquel S. Margulis and Theresa Williams |
| 2:2011cv01823 |
| July 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Lafourche |
| Carl Barbier |
| Alma L. Chasez |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 178 , IT IS ORDERED that defendants' 165 Motion to dismiss is GRANTED and that plaintiff's suit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 4/24/13.(ecm, )
|
|
Filing
137
Minute Order. Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Alma L. Chasez: Motion Hearing held on 2/6/2013 re 130 MOTION to Quash. (lag, )
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion to Dismiss. Aside from the EPA claims, all aforementioned claims against individual Defendants are DISMISSED. All other claims are reserved. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 7/13/12. (ecm, )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER AND REASONS granting 33 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's HIPAA claims against Moving Defendants, FDCA claims against Moving Defendants, Title VII claims against Hankins and Margulis, and intentional infliction of emotion distress claims against Moving Defendants, WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 3/20/12. (ecm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
