Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center v. Marzano-Lesnevich
| Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center |
| Alexandria Marzano-Lesnevich |
| 2:2011cv02102 |
| August 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Carl Barbier |
| Sally Shushan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER & REASONS: granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Reconsideration; The motion is granted to the extent that it requests the Court to correct its previous erroneous interpretation of article 971, and accordingly, the Court' ;s previous Order and Reasons (Rec. Doc. 19 ) is hereby VACATED. To the extent that Defendant contends that LCAC's request for injunctive relief constitutes a "cause of action" within the meaning of the statute, however, the motion i s DENIED. In light of the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that LCAC's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Rec. Doc. 20 ) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/9/12. (sek, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER AND REASONS denying Defendant Marzano-Leznevich's 4 Motion to Strike. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff LCAC shall submit a motion for attorney's fees and costs within 15 days. Defendant shall file any response to the Plaintiff's motion within seven days thereafter. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier. (gec, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
