Moran v. Connick et al
| John A Moran |
| Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office, Camille Buras, Leon A Cannizzaro, Jr, Jack Peebles, Louisiana State, Donna R Andrieu, Valentin M Solino, Stephen Laiche, Unidentified Parties and Harry Connick, Sr. |
| 2:2011cv02240 |
| September 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Iberville |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Sally Shushan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court is the "Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and, Alternatively, for More Definite Statement Pursuant to Rule 9" 35 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's claims under 1983 against Defendant Harry Connick, Sr., in his prior official capacity as the District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, and Defendant Leon Cannizzaro, Jr., in his official capacity as the current District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, are dismissed wi thout prejudice; (2) Plaintiff's 1983 claims against the DA Defendants in their individual capacities are dismissed with prejudice; and (3) Plaintiff's state law claims against the DA Defendants, in both their official and individual capacities, are dismissed with prejudice, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/26/2013. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER and REASONS - It appears to the Court that Plaintiff's "Second Amended Complaint" 24 was filed into the record without leave of court being granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the document be stricken from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff desires to amend his complaint to include additional allegations, he must submit, no later than ten (10) days from entry of this order, a motion for leave to file a second amending and superseding complaint accom panied by a proposed "Second Amending and Superseding Complaint" that also includes the allegations of the original and first amended complaints on which Plaintiff continues to rely. Because the proposed pleading accompanying Plaintiff's pending motion for leave to file 22 does not comply with the requirements set forth in this order, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/6/2012.(cab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
