L&L Properties 12, LLC v. Reyes

L&L Properties 12, LLC v. Reyes

Plaintiff:	L&L Properties 12, LLC
Defendant:	Arnold Reyes
Case Number:	2:2014cv00671
Filed:	March 24, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office:	New Orleans Office
County:	Orleans
Presiding Judge:	Susie Morgan
Presiding Judge:	Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 30, 2015	Filing 24 ORDER AND REASONS DENYING 10 to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and on the Basis of Improper Venue, or Alternatively MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief or MOTION for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Motion t o Dismiss 10 is hereby DENIED with leave to re-file after limited jurisdictional discovery has been completed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall have until May 14, 2015 to conduct discovery limited to the issue of personal jurisdiction, including the existence of an attorney-client relationship. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status conference is to take place in chambers on Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. to discuss the Courts Order and the methods and scope of discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent L&L intends to allege any fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation claims, L&L is to file an amended complaint by April 13, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. asserting those claims and factual allegations substantiating those claims. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 3/27/2015.(bwn)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 30, 2015

Filing 24 ORDER AND REASONS DENYING 10 to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and on the Basis of Improper Venue, or Alternatively MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief or MOTION for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Motion t o Dismiss 10 is hereby DENIED with leave to re-file after limited jurisdictional discovery has been completed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall have until May 14, 2015 to conduct discovery limited to the issue of personal jurisdiction, including the existence of an attorney-client relationship. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status conference is to take place in chambers on Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. to discuss the Courts Order and the methods and scope of discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent L&L intends to allege any fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation claims, L&L is to file an amended complaint by April 13, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. asserting those claims and factual allegations substantiating those claims. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 3/27/2015.(bwn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: L&L Properties 12, LLC v. Reyes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: L&L Properties 12, LLC
Represented By:	Stephen M. Huber
Represented By:	Charles Marshall Thomas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold Reyes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?