Gremillion et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation Group Benefits Plan et al
| Pamela Gremillion and Garrett Gremillion |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation Group Benefits Plan, Aetna Life Insurance Company, Forrest General Health Services Inc, Pine Grove Behavioral Health & Addictive Services and Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| 2:2014cv02987 |
| December 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| St Tammany |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER and REASONS granting 11 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction against Forrest General. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' request for transfer is DENIED and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Forrest General are DISMIS SED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants Lockheed Martin and Aetna have not challenged jurisdiction or venue; therefore, Plaintiffs' claims against those entities shall remain before this Court. Considering the findings, the Court declines to rule on t he issue of personal jurisdiction at this time. Furthermore, at this time and based on the showings made, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' request for jurisdictional discovery is DENIED as moot, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/22/2015. (cbs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
