Keil v. Hanson
| Curtis Antione Keil |
| Ray Hanson |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2015cv00422 |
| February 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Ouachita |
| Lance M Africk |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 and SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29 ; ORDERED that Curtis Antione Keil's 27 Motion to Supplement Objections is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Keil's 26 Motion to Object and Tim e Extension is construed in part as objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and those objections as supplemented are OVERRULED. FURTHER ORDERED that Keil's 26 Motion to Object and Time Extension is construed in part as a motion for a stay of these proceedings and that motion as supplemented is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Keil's petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 9/10/2015.(blg)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that 11 Motion to Order the Entire Appellate Record and Motion for Oral Argument is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
