Krispy Krunchy Foods, L.L.C. v. AMA Discount, Inc. et al
| Krispy Krunchy Foods, L.L.C. |
| AMA Discount, Inc., Ali M. Allan and Mohammed Allan |
| 2:2015cv00590 |
| February 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Rapides |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER and REASONS granting 66 Motion to Strike 63 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/22/2016. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER and REASONS - Based on the parties' clarification to the Court that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment 34 did not seek relief against Defendants Ali M. Allan and Mohammed Allan, IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Janu ary 13, 2016 Order and Reasons 51 is AMENDED such that partial summary judgment is rendered in Plaintiff's favor against only Defendant AMA Discount, Inc., d/b/a Chef Discount Market. In all other respects, the Order and Reasons remains the same. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/13/2016.(cbs) (NEF: MAG-2)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER and REASONS denying 37 Motion to Strike, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/13/2016. (cbs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
