Broussard v. First Tower Loan, LLC
Plaintiff: Tristan Broussard
Defendant: First Tower Loan, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv01161
Filed: April 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Calcasieu
Presiding Judge: Carl Barbier
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Motion to Alter, Amend, or Reconsider Order Staying EEOC's Claims (Rec. Doc. 114) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the discretionary stay of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's claims previously entered in this matter is MODIFIED as follows: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's claims are STAYED pending completion of the arbitration between Tristan Broussard and First Tower Loan , LLC within six (6) months from the date of this order, unless good cause be shown for an extension. The parties shall advise the Court in writing upon completion of the arbitration. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/7/16.(Reference: 15-1161, 15-2500)(sek)
December 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration, Appoint Arbitrator and to Stay Proceedings (Rec. Doc. 85) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court appoints the American Arbitration Association as the arbitral forum to administer arbitration of the dispute between Broussard and Tower. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay EEOC Claims Pending Arbitration (Rec. Doc. 96) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this matter shall be STA YED pending the outcome of the arbitration between Broussard and Tower. The Clerk of Court shall mark this action closed for statistical purposes. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction and that the case shall be restored to the t rial docket upon motion of a party if circumstances change, so that it may proceed to final disposition. This order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 12/9/15.(Reference: 15-1161, 15-2500)(sek)
October 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER & REASONS: denying 52 Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue; denying as moot 75 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 10/1/15. (Reference: all cases)(sek)
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDERED that Plaintiff's 32 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court is DENIED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier. (gec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broussard v. First Tower Loan, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tristan Broussard
Represented By: Ryan P. Delaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Tower Loan, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?