Hardy v. Scandinavian Airlines System
| Susan Hardy |
| Scandinavian Airlines System a/k/a SAS, d/b/a Scandinavian Airlines of North America, Inc., Scandinavian Airlines System also known as SAS doing business as Scandinavian Airlines of North America, Inc. and SAS |
| 2:2021cv01591 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Susie Morgan |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Tony Bryson Jobe on behalf of Susan Hardy. (Jobe, Tony) Modified on 10/1/2021 (pp).
|
|
Filing 4
AFFIDAVIT of Service by Nancy E Hamilton of Complaint and Summons served on Scandinavian Airlines System Headquarters and Scandinavian Airlines of North American Agent for Service on September 16 and 20, 2021. (Jobe, Tony)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Scandinavian Airlines System. (pp)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against Scandinavian Airlines System a/k/a SAS, d/b/a Scandinavian Airlines of North America, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9003551) filed by Susan Hardy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Tony Bryson Jobe added to party Susan Hardy(pty:pla).(Jobe, Tony)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
