Grows v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
| Gia Lewis Grows |
| Union Carbide Corporation and Dow Chemical Company |
| 2:2022cv00794 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Michael North |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (ko)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 05/26/2022. (ko)
|
|
Filing 10
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading)(Trapolin, Edward)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Gia Lewis Grows re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Thornton, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Stacy Foster. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 05/06/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (ko)
|
|
Filing 7
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Stacy Foster (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9348142) by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit PHV Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Exhibit EDLA Consent to Electronic Filing)(Richards, Gretchen)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Enroll as Additional Counsel of Record for Attorneys Carlos Andre Benach and Gretchen F. Richards for Dow Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 5/6/2022. (sbs)
|
|
Filing 5
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Counsel of Record Carlos A. Benach and Gretchen F. Richards by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Trapolin, Edward)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. Motion(s) will be submitted on 5/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Submission)(Trapolin, Edward)
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Gia Lewis Grows.(Barousse, William)
|
|
Filing fee received from Coreyll Harrell:Receipt LAE 072305 $ 402 (cc)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Jane Triche Milazzo recused. Case reassigned to Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 03/29/2022.(am)
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER AND REASONS granting Motion to Sever; This case shall be SEVERED into seven distinct civil actions. FURTHER ORDERED that, within ten days of the opening of the new civil actions, each plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in her respective case, confining the allegations therein to her respective claims. FURTHER ORDERED that, in each of the newly created cases, the respective plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of Court a filing fee of $402.00, at the time when the amended complaint is filed. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 3/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Case List Attachment, #2 Notice of Removal filed in CA 21-1067, #3 CA 21-1067 docket sheet)(lag)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
