Wolfe v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
Yvonne Wolfe |
Union Carbide Corporation and Dow Chemical Company |
2:2022cv00798 |
March 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Nannette Jolivette Brown |
Janis van Meerveld |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (am) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 05/17/2022. (am) |
Filing 10 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6). **Document contains incorrect Section. All future pleadings must reflect Section M.** (am) |
Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading)(Trapolin, Edward) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Yvonne Wolfe re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Thornton, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 **DEFICIENT**EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Sergio A. Galvan (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9350021) by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 PHV Affidavit, #3 GA Certificate of Good Standing, #4 FL Certificate of Good Standing, #5 EDLA Consent to Electronic Filing)(Richards, Gretchen) Modified text on 5/10/2022 (am). |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record for Attorney Carlos Andre Benach, Gretchen F. Richards for Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 5/6/2022. (mm) |
Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Counsel of Record Carlos A. Benach and Gretchen F. Richards by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Trapolin, Edward) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. Motion(s) will be submitted on 5/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Submission)(Trapolin, Edward) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Yvonne Wolfe.(Barousse, William) |
Filing fee received from Coreyll Harrell: Receipt LAE072309 $ 402 (cc) |
Filing 2 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Barry W Ashe. Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 3/29/2022.(jls) |
Filing 1 ORDER AND REASONS granting Motion to Sever; This case shall be SEVERED into seven distinct civil actions. FURTHER ORDERED that, within ten days of the opening of the new civil actions, each plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in her respective case, confining the allegations therein to her respective claims. FURTHER ORDERED that, in each of the newly created cases, the respective plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of Court a filing fee of $402.00, at the time when the amended complaint is filed. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 3/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Case List Attachment, #2 Notice of Removal filed in CA 21-1067, #3 CA 21-1067 docket sheet)(lag) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.