Moore v. Evonik Corporation et al
| Margie Moore |
| Evonik Corporation, Air Products Performance Manufacturing, Inc., Versum Materials Performance Manufacturing, Inc., Shell Oil Company and Shell USA Inc. |
| 2:2022cv01525 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Barry W Ashe |
| Dana Douglas |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss or, alternatively, Rule 12(e) Motion for a More Definite Statement by Evonik Corporation. Motion(s) will be submitted on 8/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Submission)(Sensenbrenner, Erica) Modified text on 7/18/2022 (am).
|
|
Filing 11
REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Shell Oil Company re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (am)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 07/12/2022. (am)
|
|
Filing 9
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum in Support of Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant, Shell Oil Company by Shell Oil Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading)(Best, Mark)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by All Plaintiffs re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Opposition to Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss. (Naquin, Brandon)
|
|
Filing 7
Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Shell USA Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Shell plc for Shell USA Inc. (Best, Mark) Modified text on 6/30/2022 (am).
|
|
Filing 6
Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Evonik Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Evonik Operations GmbH, Corporate Parent Evonik Industries AG, Corporate Parent RAG-Stiftung, Corporate Parent Evonik International Holding B.V. for Evonik Corporation (Sensenbrenner, Erica)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Amended Complaint as to Evonik Corporation answer due 7/15/2022. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 06/23/2022. (am)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Shell Oil Company. Motion(s) will be submitted on 7/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Submission)(Best, Mark)
|
|
Filing 3
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint by Evonik Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sensenbrenner, Erica)
|
|
Filing 2
AMENDED COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BLAEDC-9396535) filed by Margie Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barousse, William) Modified text on 6/13/2022 (am).
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER AND REASONS that CA 21-1089 shall be SEVERED into fourteen distinct civil actions. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs are granted 14 days from the date of severance to file amended complaints in the severed actions, confining the allegations therein to the respective plaintiff. FURTHER ORDERED that, in each of the newly created cases, the respective plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of Court a filing fee of $402.00, at the time when the amended complaint is filed. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 5/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Case List Attachment, #2 Notice of Removal filed in CA 21-1089, #3 CA 21-1089 docket sheet)(lag)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
