Daniel et al v. Caesar et al
Oran Daniel and Marilyn Daniel |
Elizabeth Caesar, Charles Malham, Christian Brothers University, Congregation of Christian Brothers, Crawford & Company, Progressive Security Insurance Company and Navigators Specialty Insurance Company |
3:2009cv00041 |
January 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Motor Vehicle Office |
East Baton Rouge |
Frank J. Polozola |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Both |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OPINION Adopting 17 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case shall be remanded to the state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 4/22/2009. (NLT, ) |
Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 1 Notice of Removal, filed by Christian Brothers University, Charles Malham, Elizabeth Caesar, Crawford & Company, Congregation of Christian Brothers...It is recommended that this case be remanded to the state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction... Objections to R&R due by 4/10/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 3/27/2009. (NLT, ) |
Filing 16 RULING granting 10 Motion to Quash deposition of plaintiff Oran Daniel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 3/24/09. (BP, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.