Alfred v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation et al
| Zachery Alfred |
| Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Dolphin Scaffolding Services, LLC |
| 3:2013cv00211 |
| April 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 59 and 60 Motions for Reconsideration. The Defendant's 30 and 31 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/17/2014. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER: Anadarko and Omni have failed to meet their burden of proof to show that "a majority of the work called for by the contract[s] is on stationary platforms or other OCSLA situses." Id. Accordingly, Anadarko 's and Omni's 30 and 31 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED without prejudice. Anadarko and Omni may file Motions for Reconsideration on or before December 8, 2014 supported by evidence as to the focus of the MSCs. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 11/26/2014. (NLT)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment... Plaintiff Zachery Alfred's claims against Defendant Anadarko Petroleum Corp. are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 11/21/2014. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
