Martin et al v. Westlake Vinyls Company LP et al
Christopher Taylor, Nathalie Hayes, Linda Martin, Ada Northern, Michael Sharper, Annie Cyprain and Kela Collins |
Westlake Chemical Corporation and Westlake Vinyls Company LP |
3:2013cv00253 |
April 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
James J. Brady |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RULING AND ORDER adopting the 9 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and granting 6 Motion to Remand. Civil Case 13-253(Linda Martin, et al v. Westlake vinyls Compalny LP, et al) is Remanded to the 23rd JDC, Ascensio n Parish, State of Louisiana. ( A Certified copy of this order sent to 23rd JDC.) The Clerk of Court shall enter this Order in the docket for the lead case (3:12-253) and in the case-specific docket for civil action 3:13-253. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/10/2014. (LLH) (Main Document 11 replaced on 3/11/2014) (LLH). |
Filing 8 ORDER Vacating 14 Order on Motions to Remand in civil actions 12-cv-253 and 12-cv-254. The Clerk of Court is to enter this Order in the docket for the lead case, and in civil actions 12-cv-254, 13-cv-253 and 13-cv-268. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 10/31/2013. (SMG) Modified to edit text on 11/1/2013 (SMG). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.