Stipe v. Butler et al
Plaintiff: Bruce Stipe
Defendant: R. Butler and J. Smith
Case Number: 3:2014cv00217
Filed: April 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: James J. Brady
Presiding Judge: Stephen C. Riedlinger
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 89 RULING Adopting the 88 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 77 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against the defendants, with prejudice, and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 4/6/2016. (LLH)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 RULING granting in part 72 Motion to Amend and Motion to Clarify Facts and Require Production of Administrative Record in Both ARP-LSP-2013-3429 and ARP-LSP-2013-3595, only to the extent that his complaint is deemed amended to allege in Part I that he also exhausted his administrative remedies in ARP-LSP-2013- 3595. Defendants are required to file an answer to the complaint, as deemed amended, only as to whether they admit or deny that the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies. In all other respects the plaintiff's motion is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 3/24/2015. (LLH)
February 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 RULING Adopting 67 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.The 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED in part, dismissing all of the plaintiff's claims except his claim that the defendants subjected him to unconstitutional conditions of confinement when they required him to wear an unclean jumpsuit for more than 30 days, and this matter be referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 02/09/2015. (NLT)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 RULING denying as premature 62 Motion for Extension of Time to Submit and 63 Motion to Deny Summary Judgment. The 65 Motion to Deny the Motion to Dismiss as Abandoned; Opposition to Defendants Motion to Deny Summary Judgment; Alternatively, Motion to Defer Ruling on Summary Judgment is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 1/20/2015. (LLH)
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 RULING denying 7 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 05/27/2014. (CGP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stipe v. Butler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Stipe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?