Johnson v. Macy's Department Store et al
| Gloria Johnson |
| ABC Insurance Company, Macy's Department Store and Mall of Louisiana |
| General Growth Properties, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Mall of Louisiana, LLC |
| Macy's Department Store |
| 3:2014cv00226 |
| April 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
RULING ON 53 SHOW CAUSE ORDER. The 56 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and Alternative Motion to Vacate Scheduled Contempt Hearing and 57 Supplemental and Amending Motion to Vacate Scheduled Contempt hearing are denied as moot. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 1/4/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
54
RULING: This Court finds that the 37 Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of defendant Macy's Retail Holdings Inc. is well-founded and is therefore granted. Plaintiff's suit against Macy's Retail Holdings Inc. is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 11/12/2015. (BCL)
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION Adopting 23 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 12 Motion to Remand is DENIED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 11/10/2014. (NLT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
