Hawthorne v. Lemoine et al
| Elijah L. Hawthorne |
| Unknown Butler, Chance Lemoine and Ernesco Lollis |
| 3:2014cv00427 |
| July 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| John W. deGravelles |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
RULING AND ORDER : Plaintiff's 149 MOTION/ Plaintiff do not Objection to the Defendants' Filein there 139 MOTION for Medical Records Under Seal is granted in part and denied in part as moot. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 8/24/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
102
OPINION Adopting 100 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 98 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 7/11/2016. (TNB)
|
|
Filing
96
RULING denying as moot 88 Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 3/30/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION Adopting 58 Report of the U.S. Magistrate Judge: The 29 Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of defendant Capt. Ernesco Lollis and the 46 Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of Sgt. Chance Lemoine are denied without prejudice to the defendants moving to dismiss the operative amended complaint and this matter be referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on /05/12/2015. (BCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
