Stroman v. Ard et al
| Donny L Stroman |
| Unknown Aguilar, Jason Ard and Unknown Blades |
| 3:2014cv00649 |
| October 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| John W. deGravelles |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
RULING granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claim against Anthony Aguillard are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 10/4/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 43 Motion to Compel. Pursuant to Rule 37(d)(3), the plaintiff shall pay to the defendants, within 14 days, reasonable expenses in the amount of $300.00. The plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel are jointly liable for these expenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 03/21/2016. (NLT)
|
|
Filing
39
RULING and ORDER: Granting 33 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff will file within 30 days of this order an amended complaint, if he can do so, with respect to his § 1983 claims against Defendant Ard in his official and individual capacity. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event that Plaintiff fails to file an amendment to his complaint within that time, his claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 11/02/2015. (ELW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
