McCray v. Vannoy et al
| John McCray |
| Emanuel Ellis, Jason Lilly and Darrel Vannoy |
| 3:2014cv00656 |
| October 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
RULING Adopting (39] Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge; denying as moot 29 and 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The above captioned case is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/27/2017. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Relief from Judgment be and is hereby GRANTED. The Court's 15 Ruling and 16 Judgment, dismissing the plaintiff's action, be and are hereby VACATED AND WITHDRAWN. Plaintiff is hereby authorized to resubmit his Motion to Amend his Complaint. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 2/11/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
15
RULING denying 7 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint. The above-captioned proceeding be DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure of the plaintiff to pay the Court's initial partial filing fee. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 1/13/2016. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
