Woodfox v. LeBlanc et al
Albert Woodfox |
John Doe #1, Kirt Gurien, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 - 5, James LeBlanc, Greg McKey and Howard Prince |
3:2014cv00662 |
October 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
James J. Brady |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 RULING granting in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claim seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and newly added claims surrounding disabilities are DISMISSED. All other claims have been sufficiently pled at this time to satisfy Rule 12(b)(6). Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 8/5/2015. (LLH) |
Filing 10 RULING regarding 4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Greg McKey, James LeBlanc, Howard Prince, Kirt Gurien. The Court finds that all claims for damages asserted against the named Defendants in their official cap acities are DISMISSED pursuant to the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The Court finds that all claims for relief asserted against the named Defendants in their individual capacities are DISMISSED as insufficiently pled. However, pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court GRANTS twenty-one (21) days for Plaintiff to amend the original complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 5/5/2015. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 4/14/2015. (LLH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.