Haynes v. Georgia Pacific LLC
Jeffery Haynes |
Georgia Pacific LLC |
3:2014cv00743 |
November 26, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
John W. deGravelles |
Richard L. Bourgeois |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 RULING AND ORDER granting 28 and 29 Motions for Summary Judgment. PlaintiffsJeffrey Haynes's and Gerald Jackson's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 09/29/2016. (KDC) (Main Document 47 replaced on 9/29/2016) (KDC). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Haynes v. Georgia Pacific LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Georgia Pacific LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffery Haynes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.