Waguespack v. Medtronic Inc. et al
| Robby J. Waguespack |
| Medtronic Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc. |
| K2M, Inc. |
| Lloyd Lile Lindsey, III and Stephen Powell |
| 3:2016cv00241 |
| April 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Order denying Motions to Transfer. This preliminary injunction shall be in effect through the trial on the merits of this case. The parties are directed to contact Magistrate Bourgeois as soon as possible to set up a scheduling conference; and Plaintiffs shall furnish security in the form of a bond set at $ 500.00, which may be posted as a cash bond with the Clerk of this Court. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 5/11/201. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
47
RULING : Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (16-cv-241: Doc. 4; 16-cv-242: Doc. 5; 16-cv-243: Doc. 5) is GRANTED, and Defendants Motion to Transfer (16-cv-241: Doc. 17; 16-cv-242: Doc. 10; 16-cv-243: Doc. 19) is DENIED. Plaintiffs shall file a proposed order in conformity herewith, after attaining approval from Defendants as to form, within 3 days of the date of this ruling. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 5/5/2016. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
