Bartholic v. Arizona
Frank Bartholic |
State of Arizona |
1:2010cv00286 |
February 18, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Alexandria Office |
Winn |
James D Kirk |
James T Trimble |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 34 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss 26 be granted and Bartholic's complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 10/21/10. (crt,Roaix, G) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bartholic v. Arizona | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frank Bartholic | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State of Arizona | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.