Sahota v. Cobb et al
| Sunny Sahota |
| Kevin W Cobb and James Busby |
| 3:2014cv02722 |
| September 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Monroe Office |
| Franklin |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Robert G James |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in this Courts Ruling 28 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 18] is GRANTED. Defendants shall not be permitted to rely on their second defense of l ack of subject matter jurisdiction based on no diversity of citizenship; their third defense of the lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000; their eleventh defense of the statutory limitati ons of liability, costs, and interest contained in LA. REV. STAT. 13:5106 and LA. REV. STAT. 13:5112; their thirteenth defense of immunity under LA. REV. STAT. 9:2798.1; and their fourteenth defense that Plaintiffs claims are time barred. Addition ally, Defendants will not be permitted to rely on their seventh defense of contributory negligence and/or assumption of risk as to Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 11/6/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D) Modified on 11/6/2015 to correct clerical error date of signature (DickersonSld, D).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
