Tuggle v. Dies et al
| William Dean Tuggle, Sr |
| Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co, Eustace L Edwards and David F Dies |
| 5:2013cv02908 |
| October 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM ORDER: William Dean Tuggle Sr (Plaintiff) filed this civil action in federal court based on an assertion of diversity jurisdiction, placing the burden on him to present facts that establish diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff will need to amend his complaint to set forth additional facts to ensure that this court is one of competent jurisdiction. If the amended complaint satisfies Plaintiffs burden that diversity exists, the court will set a scheduling conference. If, however, there is no diversity, then the court must dismiss the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff will be allowed until 12/11/2013 to file an amended complaint that complies with this order. Filing by that date is within 21 days after service of the defendants answer, so the amended complaint may be filed without leave of court. Compliance Deadline set for 12/11/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 11/21/2013. (crt,Putch, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
