Doe v. Harris et al
| Jane Doe |
| Derrick Harris, Clint Richardson, Jason Vaughn, Logan Kerr, Billy Glass, Randy Chandler and City of Shreveport |
| 5:2014cv00802 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| Karen L Hayes |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 58 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Magistrate Appeal (Record Document 58 ) be and is hereby DENIED and Magistrate Judge Hayes' Order of August 24, 2014 (Record Document [52 ]) is AFFIRMED. This Court adopts the Order and HEREBY ORDERS the Clerk of Court to unseal the First Amended Complaint (Record Document 23 ), and that the caption of this case be amended as set forth in the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 9/24/2015. (crt,Dauterive, C)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 19 Motion to proceed anonymously. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk un-seal the 23 First Amended Complaint, and the caption of this case be amended as such. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the effect of this order is STAYED for 14 days, to allow time for an appeal to the District Judge. MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 26 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 8/25/14. (crt,Crawford, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
