Grigsby & Associates, Inc. v. Shreveport et al
Grigsby & Associates Inc |
City of Shreveport, Oliver Jenkins, Michael Corbin, Jeff Everson, Terri Anderson-Scott and Julie Glass |
5:2014cv02340 |
July 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Caddo |
Karen L Hayes |
S Maurice Hicks |
Other Contract |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM RULING re 55 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim filed by Jeff Everson, Oliver Jenkins, Julie Glass, Terri Anderson-Scott, Michael Corbin, City of Shreveport. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 2/14/2018. (crt,Reasor, M) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 37 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision, affirming 36 Order on Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 09/24/2015. (crt,McDonnell, D) |
Filing 36 ORDER: Before the undersigned magistrate judge, on reference from the District Court, are three motions to strike 20 29 & 32 and a motion for admission pro hac vice 11 all filed by plaintiff. Upon consideration of same, IT IS ORDERED that the m otions to strike are deemed MOOT and/or DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for admission pro hac vice 11 is set for hearing before the undersigned at 1:30 p.m. on June 9, 2015, 2nd Floor Courtroom, U. S. Courthouse, 201 Jackson Street, Monroe, Louisiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 5/1/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.