Iberia Parish Government v. Romero

Iberia Parish Government v. Romero

Plaintiff:	Government of Iberia Parish
Defendant:	Shane Romero
Case Number:	6:2014cv02985
Filed:	October 10, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office:	Lafayette Office
County:	Iberia
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca F Doherty
Presiding Judge:	C Michael Hill
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 24, 2015	Filing 48 JUDGMENT ADOPTING Considering the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Attorneys Fees 30 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth in the magistrate judges Report and Recommendation 43 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amount of a ttorneys fees to be awarded to Romero is hereby REFERRED to the magistrate judge for consideration and recommendation. The magistrate judge shall prepare a Report recommending the amount to be awarded to Romero in consideration of the appropriate standards and evidence to be submitted by the parties. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 9/23/15. (crt,Guidry, C)
June 10, 2015	Filing 29 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 28 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Shane Romero's 7 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 USC Section 1367 is GRANTED, all of plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 6/10/15. (crt,Guidry, C)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 24, 2015

Filing 48 JUDGMENT ADOPTING Considering the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Attorneys Fees 30 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth in the magistrate judges Report and Recommendation 43 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amount of a ttorneys fees to be awarded to Romero is hereby REFERRED to the magistrate judge for consideration and recommendation. The magistrate judge shall prepare a Report recommending the amount to be awarded to Romero in consideration of the appropriate standards and evidence to be submitted by the parties. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 9/23/15. (crt,Guidry, C)

June 10, 2015

Filing 29 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 28 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Shane Romero's 7 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 USC Section 1367 is GRANTED, all of plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 6/10/15. (crt,Guidry, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Iberia Parish Government v. Romero
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Shane Romero
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Government of Iberia Parish
Represented By:	S Gary McGoffin
Represented By:	Jonathan Richard Villien
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?