Burgo v. Burgo Succession et al
Donald Christopher Burgo |
Lois Eva Sampey Cham Burgo, James S Burgo Succession and Diamond Nicole Burgo |
6:2014cv03078 |
October 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Lafayette Office |
West Feliciana |
C Michael Hill |
Richard T Haik |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER: Upon reviewing the Magistrate Judge's August 17, 2012 Ruling, R. 15 , and the entire record before the Court, the Court concludes the Magistrate Judge applied appropriate legal standards to the issues raised and did not make any clear e rror in his order nor in his ruling. Accordingly, as this Court is without jurisdiction of this entire case, IT IS ORDERED the Magistrate Judge's Ruling is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff, Donald Christopher Burgo's 14 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is to REMAND this action to the 16th JDC, St. Mary Parish, Louisiana. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 12/8/2014. (crt,Putch, A) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM RULING: Succession proceedings were commenced in the 16th JDC, St. Mary Parish, Louisiana entitled Succession of James S. Burgo, bearing docket number19379. For the reason set forth above, this succession proceeding will be remanded to the state court, subject to the stay set forth in the accompanying order. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Michael Hill on 11/12/2014. (crt,Putch, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.