Klosowski v. Bay City, City of et al
| Ron Klosowski |
| Bay City, City of and Joe Ledesma |
| 1:2015cv10636 |
| February 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Bay |
| Thomas L. Ludington |
| Patricia T. Morris |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER Denying 65 Motion for Reconsideration and 75 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit VA Records) (KWin)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Granting Defendants' 51 Motion in Limine, Granting in Part Plaintiff's 48 Motion in Limine and Denying Defendants' 46 , 47 , 50 Motions in Limine. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting Defendants' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Denying 27 Motion to Strike, Granting in Part and Denying in Part 26 Motion for Reconsideration/Judgment on the Pleadings/Leave to File Second Motion for Summary Judgment, Granting Defendant Bay City Leave to File Second Motion for Summary Judgment, and Adjourning Scheduling Order. (Second Motion for Summary Judgment due by 4/5/2016) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Sian, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 10 . Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (JCur)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
