Novak et al v. Federspiel
Plaintiff: Gerald Novak and Adam Wenzel
Defendant: William L. Federspiel
Case Number: 1:2021cv12008
Filed: August 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Ludington
Referring Judge: Patricia T Morris
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *William L. Federspiel* (SKra)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order REQUEST for SUMMONS for All Defendants. (Ellison, Philip)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction as to Count II - Claim-and-Delivery MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count II - Claim-and-Delivery by All Plaintiffs (Ellison, Philip)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction as to Count II - Claim-and-Delivery, MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count II - Claim-and-Delivery by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Police Report, #3 Exhibit 2 - Order for Discharge from Probation, #4 Exhibit 3 - Register of Actions People v Heinrich, #5 Exhibit 4 - Emails, #6 Exhibit 5 - Novak Declaration, #7 Exhibit 6 - Wenzel Declaration, #8 Exhibit 7 - Property Room Records, #9 Exhibit 8 - Order, Saginaw County Circuit Court, #10 Exhibit 9 - Order, Saginaw County District Court, #11 Exhibit 10 - 70th District Court Briefing) (Ellison, Philip)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)
August 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. No summons requested. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8596699 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Saginaw - County Where Action Arose: Saginaw - County of 1st Defendant: Saginaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): 70th District Court - Saginaw, 21-0781-GZ (6), Judge Terry L. Clark] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Police Report, #2 Exhibit 2 - Register of Actions, #3 Exhibit 3 - Order of Probation Discharge, #4 Exhibit 4 - Emails) (Ellison, Philip)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Novak et al v. Federspiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerald Novak
Represented By: Philip L. Ellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Wenzel
Represented By: Philip L. Ellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William L. Federspiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?