Flynn et al v. Oakland County et al
Case Number: 2:2005cv73850
Filed: October 6, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Presiding Judge: Steven D Pepe
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER of Clarification Regarding Defendants Crockett, Findlay and Cain. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
July 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 106 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER GRANTING 84 MOTION for Summary Judgment Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (DeSa)
April 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER Staying Action on 99 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Amber Flynn, Dan Flynn. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER granting 90 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and Vacating Dismissal of Oakland County as a Defendant and Vacating Stay of Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER (1) Requiring Additional Filings by Plaintiff; (2) Dismissing Count IV Against Oakland County; (3) Staying Further Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flynn et al v. Oakland County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?