Friske v. Scutt et al
Plaintiff: William Friske, Jr
Defendant: Scutt, Barlow, B Schmeltz and Cooke
Case Number: 2:2007cv13747
Filed: September 6, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Morgan
Presiding Judge: Gerald E Rosen
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER Adopting 65 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint Signed by District Judge Gerald E Rosen. (LHac)
February 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 51 MOTION for Judgment filed by William Friske, Jr, 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment , Brief in Support, Index of Exhibits, Exhibits A through H, with Certificate of Service filed by Cooke, Patricia Caruso, Barlow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk. (PPel)
December 11, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER affirming Magistrate Judge's 55 Amended Order denying plaintiff's motion to amend complaint. Signed by District Judge Gerald E Rosen. (DHam)
November 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 55 AMENDED ORDER Denying re 41 MOTION to Amend Complaint filed by William Friske, Jr, 39 Amended Complaint to Injoinder and Request filed by William Friske, Jr, and Order Regarding Plaintiff's Access to Copying. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk. (PPel)
September 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER Striking 43 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Friske, Jr, 42 Exhibit Index filed by William Friske, Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk. (PPel)
September 11, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Granting Defendants' Motions to Seal 26 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order; granting 30 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk. (PPel)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Friske v. Scutt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Friske, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B Schmeltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cooke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?