Henderson v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Michigan Eastern District Henderson v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Henderson v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Plaintiff:	Michael Corey Henderson
Defendant:	Social Security, Commissioner of
Case Number:	2:2013cv11503
Filed:	April 2, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County:	Oakland
Presiding Judge:	Julian Abele Cook
Presiding Judge:	David R. Grand
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 5, 2014	Filing 17 AMENDED ORDER re 16 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation - Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part to the extent it seeks remand and denied in part to the extent it seeks an award of benefits, and that, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this case is REMANDED to the ALJ for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)
August 4, 2014	Filing 16 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Corey Henderson, 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of. Court hereby grants the Plaintiff's motion for summ ary judgment (ECF No. 11) to the extent that it seeks remand, and denies the request as it pertains to an award of benefits. This case is remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation - Signed by District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 5, 2014

Filing 17 AMENDED ORDER re 16 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation - Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part to the extent it seeks remand and denied in part to the extent it seeks an award of benefits, and that, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this case is REMANDED to the ALJ for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)

August 4, 2014

Filing 16 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Corey Henderson, 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of. Court hereby grants the Plaintiff's motion for summ ary judgment (ECF No. 11) to the extent that it seeks remand, and denies the request as it pertains to an award of benefits. This case is remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation - Signed by District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Corey Henderson
Represented By:	Diane M. Kwitoski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?