ADAMS v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Plaintiff: DAVID W. ADAMS
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Case Number: 2:2013cv14142
Filed: September 27, 2013
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Office: Detroit Office
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Duggan
Referring Judge: Charles E. Binder
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 22, 2014 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 15 Report and Recommendation on 15 Report and Recommendation, 14 Motion for Summary Judgment, 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ADAMS v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID W. ADAMS
Represented By: Kelie C. Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.