Chipps v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: HEATHER CHIPPS
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2014cv11194
Filed: March 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Arenac
Presiding Judge: Sean F. Cox
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Hluchaniuk
Nature of Suit: Health Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for Granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security, Denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by HEATHER CHIPPS re 26 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chipps v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HEATHER CHIPPS
Represented By: Jessica J. Brissette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?