Greiner v. Charter County of Macomb, Michigan et al
John P. Greiner |
AFSCME LOCAL893, Charter County of Macomb, Michigan, Macomb County Road Commission and Macomb County Department of Roads |
2:2014cv13979 |
October 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Macomb |
Matthew F. Leitman |
R. Steven Whalen |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 164 ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's 158 MOTION for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 159 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 158 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 157 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 155 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 154 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 153 Motion to Correct the Record. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 152 ORDER Denying 151 Motion to Expand Record. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 150 ORDER Denying 149 Motion to Expand Record. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 138 ORDER Granting Defendant's 123 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's First Amendment Retaliation Claim. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 132 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 130 Motion for Stay of Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 127 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 125 and 126 Motions for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 124 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 118 , 119 , 121 and 122 Motions for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 117 ORDER (1) Granting AFSCME's 90 Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) Denying Without Prejudice AFSCME's Request for Sanctions; (3) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Without Prejudice Macomb County's 89 Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) Denying Plaintiff's 115 Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Audio Tapes. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 114 ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff's 111 Motion for Leave to File Flash Drive in the Traditional Manner and (2) Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 109 Motion Requesting the Court to Listen to Excluded Portions of the Depositions in this Case and Rule on Including These Missing Parts into, or as Part of the Depositions and Part of the Record. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 102 ORDER Granting 100 and 101 MOTIONS for Extension of Time. (Response due by 4:30 p.m. on 4/14/2017, Reply due by 4:30 p.m. on 5/5/2017.) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 99 ORDER Granting 91 Motion to Withdraw and Addressing Plaintiff's 98 Requests for Relief. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 92 ORDER to Appear for Hearing on Plaintiff's Counsel's 91 Emergency MOTION for Withdrawal of Attorney. (Motion Hearing set for 3/1/2017 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman.) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 75 ORDER Granting Defendant's 71 Motion to Compel Deposition of Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 39 ORDER Granting Defendant's 38 Motion for a More Definite Statement. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 25 ORDER Dismissing Defendant AFSCME LOCAL893. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (Monda, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.