Larry v. Powerski
Plaintiff: Yolanda Larry
Defendant: Theresa Powerski
Case Number: 2:2014cv14172
Filed: October 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Genesee
Presiding Judge: David M. Lawson
Presiding Judge: Mona K. Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff's 14 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Joint Final Pretrial Order due on or before 12/14/2015. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larry v. Powerski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yolanda Larry
Represented By: Michael E. Freifeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Powerski
Represented By: Michael W. Edmunds
Represented By: Sean M. Siebigteroth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?