Padlo v. Commissioner
Plaintiff: Craig W. Padlo
Defendant: of Social Security Commissioner
Case Number: 2:2015cv11130
Filed: March 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Stafford
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Tarnow
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 19 Report and Recommendation, Granting Defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Overruling Plaintiff's 20 Objection. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (TMcg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Padlo v. Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig W. Padlo
Represented By: D. Louis Weir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: of Social Security Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?