Holek v. Aurora Cooperative Elevator Company
Plaintiff: Anthony Holek
Defendant: Aurora Cooperative Elevator Company
Case Number: 2:2015cv11322
Filed: April 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Shiawassee
Presiding Judge: Gerald E. Rosen
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING 14 , 17 CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (KWin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holek v. Aurora Cooperative Elevator Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Holek
Represented By: Russell F. Ethridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aurora Cooperative Elevator Company
Represented By: Robert L. Duty
Represented By: Christyn M. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?