Hoffman v. Neves et al
| Robert Hoffman |
| Stacey Neves and Vickie Carlson |
| 2:2017cv13263 |
| October 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Branch |
| Robert H. Cleland |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER denying 136 Motion for Leave to Proceed Pro Se; denying 137 Request for Preparation of Transcripts. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
132
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER Setting Trial. (Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2023 02:00 PM before District Judge Terrence G. Berg, Jury Trial set for 10/10/2023 09:00 AM before District Judge Terrence G. Berg) Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER Adopting 95 Report and Recommendation and Granting 84 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER OVERRULING 88 Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Order. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER Overruling Defendant's Objections, and Adopting 38 Report and Recommendation re 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (WBar)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
