McCoy v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
| 2:2020cv11345 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 52 Motion to Extend Time on Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction, and granting 53 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 45 , 48 Motion to Amend Judgment. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT. Approved by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING 15 MOTION for Reconsideration, 16 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER STAYING CASE and Referral to the Pro Se Prisoner Early Mediation Program. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
9
OPINION and ORDER Partially Dismissing Civil Rights Complaint. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCoy v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
