Brown v. The Professional Group et al
| 4:2020cv11466 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Flint Office |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER Extending Dispositive Motion Deadline. Dispositive Motion Cut-off RESET for 1/6/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (MacKay, K)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Granting in Part 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Case Management and Scheduling Order and to Extend Pre-Trial Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (MacKay, K)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Granting in Part 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Allowing Limited Appearance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (MacKay, K)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION and ORDER Granting 19 MOTION to Dismiss Partially the First Amended Complaint. Defendants Madgalene Fernander and Norris Martin terminated. Signed by District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (THal)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 12 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time. Answer due by 1/8/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (MacKay, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. The Professional Group et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
