Debarry v. Kalisik et al
| 2:2021cv10409 |
| May 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 67 To Dismiss Without Prejudice The Retaliatory Misconduct Claim Against Defendant Lennox. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
|
|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER PARTIALLY OVERRULING DEFENDANT LENNOX'S 59 OBJECTION AND PARTIALLY ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART DEFENDANT LENNOX'S 34 MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REMANDING MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION and ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 22 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
|
|
Filing
6
OPINION and ORDER Dismissing the 1 Complaint as to Defendants Kalisik, Carpenter and Kauser. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Debarry v. Kalisik et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
