Key v. City of Detroit
| Kelly Key |
| City of Detroit |
| 2:2022cv10849 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING OTHER MATTERS to Magistrate Judge Grand: Settlement Conference. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 1/13/2022, Discovery due by 11/18/2022. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Refer to image for additional dates) (AChu)
|
|
Filing 8
DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Stempien, Eric)
|
|
Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before District Judge Terrence G. Berg: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 6/14/2022 (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (AChu)
|
|
Set Deadlines/Hearings: TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference RESET for 6/14/2022 04:00 PM before District Judge Terrence G. Berg (AChu)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 6/14/2022 10:00 AM before District Judge Terrence G. Berg (AChu)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by City of Detroit. (Jones, Letitia)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrae D Smith on behalf of City of Detroit. (Smith, Andrae)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Letitia C. Jones on behalf of City of Detroit. (Jones, Letitia)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. City of Detroit served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (Stempien, Eric)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *City of Detroit* (LGra)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Kelly Key against City of Detroit with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8881831 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Stempien, Eric)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Key v. City of Detroit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelly Key | |
| Represented By: | Eric Stempien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Detroit | |
| Represented By: | Andrae D Smith |
| Represented By: | Letitia C. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
